И. Нургалиев
Москва
This epigraph is more than two thousand years old.
Therefore barely the all written history of the humanity is the history of how education
and human endeavor based on knowledge and competency shape progress making a person free
from hardships of every day living, from vulnerability of a will of strangers'
demagoguery.
While Russia is currently committed to solving the problems of the
previous century, more prosperous countries are focusing on securing the prerequisites for
global leadership in the 21st century on the basis of their own national interests.?
Previous attributes of nations' leadership, such as industrial and military might, access
to mineral resources, and integrity in geopolitical alliances, are being pushed aside in
favor of the new attributes of the information age: access to decision making resources,
telecommunications and other key technologies, global competency, and modern education.?
All nations - big and small, developed and developing - need to adjust their plans and
vision for the future under the pressure of globalization. One of their main responses has
been a global competence mission through international education, and especially study
abroad programs.
The governments of the U.S., Great Britain, Australia and Canada are
increasing their efforts in international education, generating many changes to its form
and content in the process, and adjusting it to meet new trends. A memorandum on
international education policy released by President Bill Clinton on April 19, 2000 to the
heads of executive departments and agencies stated that: "To continue to compete
successfully in the global economy and to maintain our role as a world leader, the United
States needs to ensure that its citizens develop a broad understanding of the world,
proficiency in other languages, and knowledge of other cultures."? The United States'
leadership, as it is understood by the U.S. government, also depends on building ties with
those who will guide the political, cultural, and economic development of their countries
in the future. Confrontationally-minded Russian politicians might refer to these
individuals as "the fifth column".
President Clinton declared that a coherent, coordinated, and
sustainable international education strategy would need to meet the double challenges,
prioritized since Senator Fulbright's initiative, of preparing American citizens for a
changing global environment while continuing to attract and educate future leaders of
other nations.
Roughly 500,000 international students are currently studying in the
United States at the postsecondary level. They not only contribute over $9 billion
annually to the American economy, but also enrich university student bodies and
communities. They are developing a lifelong appreciation of American achievements,
methods, and attitudes. The U.S. Government considers the goodwill and understanding of
American values that these students receive (if not necessarily adopt) one of its greatest
foreign policy assets. That is why the policy of the U.S. Government's support for
international education has been solid and sustained.
Although American universities still face little trouble in attracting
international undergraduate and graduate students, competition in the international
education market is growing. In 1997-1998, for example, the number of international
students in the U.S. rose by just 2 percent after having grown by nearly 5 percent the
previous year.
As President Clinton pointed out, "Other nations are working very
hard to make their exchange opportunities more attractive, more accessible and less
costly. We should not be resting on our laurels." He may have had the United Kingdom
in mind when he spoke these words.? On June 18, 1999 Prime Minister Tony Blair announced
the start of a worldwide campaign to promote British universities and colleges overseas,
and to attract more international students to the U.K. Speaking at the London School of
Economics, Mr. Blair said, "Our universities and colleges are second to none. Their
world-class reputation means that they are among the most popular for international
students. I am determined to build on this great strength with a long term strategy to
attract many more. The institutions, their students and our economy will reap considerable
rewards."
The Russian share of the international education market does not
position it as a heavy weight, even though Russians enjoy a well established education
system with long-lasting traditions. As Alexander Kondakov, Vice Minister of Education of
the Russian Federation reported, some 60,000 students from countries other than the former
Soviet Union are studying at Russian universities and contributing $100 million dollars
annually to the Russian economy.
The new Russian presidential administration agrees it is important to
focus on breakthrough technologies and adopt a long term perspective, but the role of
educators is to incorporate the re-design of international education programs into the
current agenda so that the Russian education system meets emerging challenges. The
graduates of U.S. Government-sponsored programs are an underestimated asset to the
government in consulting and to schools in promoting study abroad programs.? In light of
all this, I would like to propose the following topic for a future Muskie/FSA alumni
event: What can American university alumni recommend to Russia regarding education reform
and study abroad programs?
As far as to the priorities in the governmental international education
policy I would recommend the following:
More modern saying than Epictetus' focuses on the global education specifically and highlights the importance of the global education in making nations free off mutual prejudices: "Educational exchange can turn nations into people, contributing as no other form of communication can to the humanizing of international relations. Man's capacity for decent behavior seems to vary directly with his perception of others as individual humans with human motives and feelings, whereas his capacity for barbarism seems related to his perception of an adversary in abstract terms, as the embodiment, that is, of some evil design or ideology." (Senator J. William Fulbright)
© Нургалиев И., 2000